Database Comparison

Amazon DynamoDB vs Redis Enterprise

Independent comparison for enterprise buyers. Updated February 2026.

Quick verdict: Amazon DynamoDB is the stronger choice as a durable, serverless NoSQL store for high-throughput key-value and document workloads with predictable low latency. Redis Enterprise is the stronger choice when sub-millisecond, in-memory access and rich data structures are the priority, often as a caching or real-time layer. The key differentiator is durability versus speed: DynamoDB persists data to disk with managed scaling, while Redis Enterprise serves from memory and optimizes for the lowest possible latency.

CriteriaAmazon DynamoDBRedis Enterprise
Editorial score4.5 / 5.04.1 / 5.0
VendorAmazon Web ServicesRedis Ltd.
Data modelNoSQL key-value and documentIn-memory key-value with data structures and modules
StorageDurable, disk-backed (SSD)Memory-first, optional persistence and flash tiering
DeploymentFully serverless on AWSSelf-managed, Redis Cloud, or cloud marketplaces
Pricing ModelOn-demand or provisioned + storagePer-shard subscription or consumption-based cloud
Latency profileSingle-digit msSub-millisecond
Key strengthDurable scale with near-zero operationsLowest latency and versatile data structures
Key limitationNo server-side joins; index cost growsMemory-bound cost; durability needs configuration
Best forDurable high-scale NoSQL backendsCaching, sessions, real-time analytics
How we researched this comparison. Assessments here synthesise vendor documentation, independent analyst coverage, and aggregated public review-platform sentiment, applied through our methodology. The Editorial score is TechVendorIndex's own editorial estimate — not a count of reviews we collected. How our scores work →

Storage model and durability

DynamoDB stores data durably on SSD-backed storage replicated across multiple Availability Zones, so it functions as a primary store for high-scale NoSQL workloads without a separate durability strategy. Reads can be eventually or strongly consistent, and global tables add multi-region replication.

Redis Enterprise holds the working dataset in memory, which is the source of its speed but also means durability is a configured property through RDB snapshots, append-only files, replication, and Active-Active. Teams that need a guaranteed durable system of record either configure Redis persistence carefully or, more commonly, pair Redis with a durable backing store.

Performance characteristics

Redis Enterprise delivers sub-millisecond latency and extremely high per-node throughput because it operates in memory, making it the standard for caching, rate limiting, leaderboards, queues, and real-time feature serving. Its modules add search, JSON, and time-series capabilities in the same platform.

DynamoDB delivers consistent single-digit-millisecond latency at effectively unbounded scale through automatic partitioning, with DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) available as an in-memory cache to reach microsecond reads. For most key-based access at very large scale, DynamoDB is fast and predictable, though not as fast as native in-memory Redis for the hottest data.

Pricing model

DynamoDB charges per request (on-demand) or per provisioned capacity unit, plus storage and any global secondary index throughput. On-demand costs nothing when idle and was reduced about 50 percent in late 2024; Database Savings Plans arrived in 2025 for committed discounts. Index proliferation is the main cost driver. Pricing verified June 2026.

Redis Enterprise is licensed per shard for self-managed deployments or billed by memory and throughput on Redis Cloud through Redis Billing Units. Cost scales with the amount of data held in memory, so large datasets can be more expensive than DynamoDB's disk-based storage. Enterprise rates are quote-based. Self-hosting teams should account for the 2024 RSALv2/SSPLv1 license change.

Operations and architectural fit

DynamoDB is fully serverless with no nodes to manage, making it low-operations for teams that want scale without infrastructure. Redis Enterprise, whether self-managed or on Redis Cloud, involves sizing memory, shards, and replication, though the managed cloud reduces this. Architecturally the two often coexist: DynamoDB or another durable store holds the data, and Redis Enterprise provides a sub-millisecond cache or real-time layer. Choosing between them as the sole store comes down to whether durability at scale or in-memory latency is the dominant requirement.

What buyers say

Buyers frequently note that DynamoDB scales without operational effort and that its serverless model and zero idle cost on-demand suit unpredictable, high-traffic workloads. The recurring DynamoDB criticism is that global secondary indexes raise cost and that rigid key design makes evolving access patterns painful. Redis Enterprise buyers frequently praise sub-millisecond latency and the breadth of its data structures and modules, which let one platform serve caching, queues, search, and real-time features. The common Redis complaint is memory-driven cost at scale and the configuration needed to meet durability targets, plus uncertainty after the 2024 license changes. Many architects describe a layered pattern rather than a binary choice, using DynamoDB for durable scale and Redis Enterprise as the speed layer, with the decision hinging on whether the workload's priority is durability or latency.

When to choose Amazon DynamoDB

Choose Amazon DynamoDB when you need a durable, serverless NoSQL store that scales to very high throughput with predictable single-digit-millisecond latency and minimal operations. It fits IoT, event ingestion, user profiles, shopping carts, and serverless backends with known key-based access patterns. Add DynamoDB Accelerator if you need microsecond reads. Confirm your access patterns fit partition-key design, and watch global secondary index usage, which is the main driver of unexpected cost.

When to choose Redis Enterprise

Choose Redis Enterprise when sub-millisecond latency, high throughput, and versatile data structures are the priority: caching, session storage, rate limiting, leaderboards, queues, and real-time analytics, including multi-region Active-Active. It is most effective as a speed layer over a durable store rather than the sole system of record, unless you configure persistence to meet your durability targets. Plan for memory-based cost growth and review current Redis licensing if you intend to self-host.

Alternatives to both

Memcached
Simple pure cache for basic key-value caching
4.3
Managed relational engine for durable SQL data
4.5
Managed document database with flexible schema
4.6
Apache Cassandra
Wide-column store for write-heavy distributed scale
4.2
Memory-first NoSQL with SQL-like query and caching
4.3
Full Amazon DynamoDB Review Full Redis Enterprise Review All Database Management Related: DynamoDB vs Cassandra

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DynamoDB durable like a primary database?
Yes. DynamoDB persists data on SSD-backed storage replicated across Availability Zones, so it serves as a durable primary store for NoSQL workloads. Redis Enterprise is memory-first and treats durability as a configured option, which is why it is often used as a cache rather than the sole durable store.
Which has lower latency, DynamoDB or Redis Enterprise?
Redis Enterprise is lower-latency because it serves from memory at sub-millisecond speeds. DynamoDB delivers single-digit-millisecond latency, and DynamoDB Accelerator can reach microsecond reads through in-memory caching. For the hottest data, native Redis is fastest; for durable scale, DynamoDB is more predictable to operate.
How do their pricing models differ?
DynamoDB charges per request or provisioned capacity plus storage, with on-demand costing nothing when idle. Redis Enterprise is licensed per shard or billed by memory and throughput on Redis Cloud. Because Redis holds data in memory, large datasets often cost more than DynamoDB's disk-based storage. Both need quotes at enterprise scale.
Can DynamoDB and Redis Enterprise work together?
Yes. A common architecture uses DynamoDB as the durable store and Redis Enterprise as a sub-millisecond cache and real-time layer in front of it. This pairs DynamoDB's managed scale and durability with Redis's lowest-latency access for hot data, high-traffic endpoints, and real-time features.
Which is easier to operate?
DynamoDB is easier because it is fully serverless with no nodes, patching, or failover to manage. Redis Enterprise requires sizing memory, shards, and replication, although Redis Cloud reduces that overhead. Teams that want scale with minimal infrastructure management generally find DynamoDB the lower-operations option.
Last updated: February 2026

Get a free, independent vendor shortlist

Tell us what you're evaluating and we'll send a tailored shortlist of vendors that actually fit — no vendor funding, no pay-to-play.

6,000+ vendors · 893 comparisons · 48 country guides · Independent & vendor-neutral

Get a Free Shortlist →