Independent comparison for enterprise buyers. Updated May 2026.
Quick verdict: Choose Confluence for serious wiki documentation, structured spaces, Jira integration, and mature governance. Choose Google Sites when you need a lightweight intranet inside Google Workspace and content depth, permissions, and roadmap richness are not priorities. The key differentiator is product ambition: Confluence is a dedicated documentation platform under active development, while Google Sites is an included Workspace tool aimed at simple internal sites.
| Criteria | Confluence | Google Sites |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 4.2 / 5.0 | 3.8 / 5.0 |
| Deployment | Cloud (Atlassian Cloud) or Data Center (self-hosted) | Cloud SaaS (Google Workspace) |
| Pricing Model | Per-user tiered subscription | Included in Google Workspace tiers |
| Target Buyer | Engineering, IT, software-led organisations | Workspace customers needing simple intranet pages |
| Editor | Rich page editor with macros, templates, databases | Lightweight WYSIWYG with embedded Workspace content |
| Integrations | Jira, Bitbucket, Forge, Marketplace apps | Drive, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Forms |
| Governance | Audit log, Atlassian Guard, Data Center option | Workspace admin controls, Vault retention, context-aware access |
| Key Limitation | Editor learning curve, Marketplace cost stack | Limited as a serious knowledge base or wiki |
Confluence is a dedicated wiki and documentation platform with spaces, page hierarchies, templates, macros, Smart Links to Jira and beyond, and an extensive Marketplace ecosystem. The product is built for collaborative knowledge work — runbooks, RFCs, design documents, post-mortems, project hubs, internal handbooks — and supports the depth and structure that mature engineering and IT organisations expect. Atlassian Intelligence layers drafting, summarisation, and Q&A across Confluence, Jira, and Jira Service Management.
Google Sites is a lightweight intranet and internal pages tool included with Google Workspace. It targets simple use cases: team landing pages, departmental intranets, project microsites, event pages, and basic internal portals. The editor is straightforward, content embeds tightly with Drive, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Calendar, and Forms, and pages publish quickly without administrator involvement. It is not designed to compete with dedicated wiki or knowledge management tools.
Wiki and documentation depth heavily favours Confluence. Page templates for engineering and IT workflows, inline comments, structured tables, Whiteboards, Databases, and a rich macro ecosystem support serious documentation at scale. Google Sites does not match this depth; it does not have page templates of comparable richness, sophisticated macros, or first-class wiki affordances such as hierarchical spaces or shared templates across teams.
Integration footprint differs sharply. Confluence integrates natively with Jira and Bitbucket, supports a broad Marketplace including Slack, Microsoft Teams, GitHub, Figma, Lucid, and many other tools, and offers Forge for custom extensions. Google Sites integrates tightly within Google Workspace — embedding Docs, Sheets, Slides, Calendar, Forms, Drive — but has comparatively thin third-party integration depth. Each suits its surrounding ecosystem.
Governance and enterprise readiness is broader on the Confluence side, with audit logs, Atlassian Guard, IP allowlisting, SCIM, data residency, and Data Center self-hosting. Google Sites benefits from Workspace's admin controls, Vault retention, context-aware access, and Workspace-wide DLP, but its own governance surface is comparatively thin given its lightweight scope. Neither is the right tool for highly regulated record management — both rely on broader governance estates rather than first-class records features.
Confluence Cloud Free supports up to 10 users; Standard lists at $5.16 per user per month, Premium at $10.02, and Enterprise is quoted directly (list pricing as of mid-2026). Atlassian Intelligence is included from Premium upward. Confluence Data Center is licensed per user starting at approximately $30,000 per year for 500-user tiers. Marketplace apps and Forge extensions are an additional spend stream that frequently adds 15–25% to per-seat cost in real deployments.
Google Sites is included with all Google Workspace tiers at no incremental cost; there is no standalone Sites SKU. This makes Sites effectively free for any Workspace customer, which is its primary advantage over Confluence for lightweight intranet use cases. The principal buying-side caveat is fit-for-purpose: free-with-Workspace is only meaningful value if Google Sites' lightweight scope matches the need. Organisations that genuinely require a wiki or knowledge base will find Sites insufficient and end up paying for Confluence, Notion, or SharePoint in addition.
Choose Confluence if your organisation needs a serious wiki and documentation platform, you have engineering, IT, product, or operations teams that produce runbooks, design documents, RFCs, or technical specifications, or you already use Jira at scale. Confluence is also the preferred choice where Forge and Marketplace extensibility are valued, where Data Center self-hosting is required, or where structured spaces, templates, and page hierarchies are non-negotiable. Most software-led mid-market and large enterprises adopt Confluence regardless of broader suite choices.
Choose Google Sites if your organisation runs on Google Workspace and your need is limited to simple intranet pages, team landing pages, departmental microsites, or event pages with embedded Workspace content. Sites is a reasonable choice for small to mid-size organisations whose knowledge management lives primarily inside Docs and Drive, and for any team that wants quick, governance-free page creation. It also pairs well with a separate dedicated wiki tool for teams that need both lightweight portals and serious documentation.
Tell us what you're evaluating and we'll send a tailored shortlist of vendors that actually fit — no vendor funding, no pay-to-play.
6,000+ vendors · 893 comparisons · 48 country guides · Independent & vendor-neutral