IAM Comparison

Microsoft Entra ID vs Saviynt EIC

Independent comparison for enterprise buyers. Updated April 2026.

Quick verdict: Microsoft Entra ID is the identity backbone for organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 and Azure, offering access management, conditional access, and a governance add-on at predictable per-user pricing. Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud is a vendor-neutral, converged platform combining deep identity governance, application access governance, and PAM across heterogeneous environments. The key differentiator is ecosystem fit: Entra ID is the efficient choice inside the Microsoft stack, while Saviynt is the stronger independent governance platform for complex, multi-vendor estates.

CriteriaMicrosoft Entra IDSaviynt EIC
Editorial score4.5 / 5.04.5 / 5.0
DeploymentCloud SaaS, integral to Microsoft 365 / AzureCloud-native SaaS, 25+ regional data centres
Pricing ModelPer user/month: P1 $6, P2 $9, Governance +$7 add-onSubscription per identity/module, quote-based
Target BuyerMicrosoft 365 / Azure-centric organisationsMulti-vendor enterprises needing deep, neutral governance
ImplementationFast within Microsoft estate; weeksLong; steep learning curve and lengthy setup
Key strengthNative Microsoft integration, conditional access, value in E5Converged IGA + AAG + PAM, deep cross-platform governance
Key limitationGovernance depth trails specialists outside Microsoft estateSlow support and documentation gaps reported by buyers
Best forMicrosoft-centric identity and accessConverged governance across heterogeneous systems
How we researched this comparison. Assessments here synthesise vendor documentation, independent analyst coverage, and aggregated public review-platform sentiment, applied through our methodology. The Editorial score is TechVendorIndex's own editorial estimate — not a count of reviews we collected. How our scores work →

What each product is

Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure Active Directory) is Microsoft's cloud identity and access platform. It underpins sign-in to Microsoft 365 and Azure and to thousands of integrated applications, providing single sign-on, conditional access, multi-factor authentication, and, through the Entra ID Governance add-on, entitlement management and lifecycle workflows. For organisations already invested in Microsoft, Entra ID is the natural identity layer.

Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud (EIC) is a vendor-neutral converged identity platform. It combines identity governance and administration, application access governance, third-party access governance, data access governance, and native privileged access in one cloud system across more than 25 regional data centres. Saviynt is designed for organisations that need deep governance across many different systems regardless of vendor.

Feature comparison

Entra ID's strength is integration and value within the Microsoft ecosystem. Conditional access, identity protection, and privileged identity management are tightly woven into Microsoft 365 and Azure, and much of the capability is bundled with E5 licensing, which improves the economics for existing Microsoft customers. Its governance, delivered via the Entra ID Governance add-on, has matured but is generally lighter than dedicated governance platforms once you move beyond Microsoft-centric estates.

Saviynt's strength is governance breadth and neutrality. It governs access across heterogeneous on-premises and cloud applications, models risk and separation-of-duties, and converges governance with privileged and data-access controls. In mixed-vendor environments where governance must span SAP, Oracle, cloud platforms, and legacy systems uniformly, Saviynt's depth and connector coverage exceed what Entra ID provides natively.

Pricing comparison

Microsoft Entra ID has transparent per-user pricing. As of 2026, Entra ID P1 is about $6 per user per month and P2 about $9, with the Entra ID Governance add-on at roughly $7 per user per month requiring P1 or P2. Many organisations already hold these rights through Microsoft 365 E3 or E5 bundles, which makes Entra ID highly cost-efficient where the licensing is sunk. Buyers should confirm which governance features need the separate add-on.

Saviynt is quote-based, priced per identity and by module. As with other converged platforms, the subscription understates total cost because configuration and integration work are substantial, and buyers report total cost running well above the headline figure. Saviynt can be more economical than buying separate governance and privileged tools, but it is rarely cheaper than Entra ID for an organisation that already owns Microsoft licensing covering its identity needs.

Fit and implementation

Entra ID deploys quickly inside a Microsoft estate because the identity directory already exists; enabling conditional access, MFA, and governance features is largely configuration. Saviynt is a longer programme, with buyers consistently citing a steep learning curve, lengthy setup, and uneven support with documentation gaps. The implementation gap reflects Entra ID building on an existing platform versus Saviynt deploying broad cross-system governance from scratch.

On fit, choose Entra ID when the organisation is Microsoft-centric and wants efficient identity and access tightly integrated with its productivity and cloud stack. Choose Saviynt when governance must span many vendors uniformly, when converged IGA, AAG, and PAM are required, and when independence from a single platform vendor is a priority. The decision usually follows the organisation's broader platform strategy.

Alternatives to both

SailPoint Identity Security
Dedicated, vendor-neutral IGA depth
4.4
Okta Workforce Identity
Best-of-breed access management and SSO
4.5
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
Deep dedicated privileged access management
4.4
Ping Identity
Access management for complex enterprise estates
4.3
Full Microsoft Entra ID Review Full Saviynt EIC Review Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta Workforce All Identity & Access Management

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Microsoft Entra ID or Saviynt better for governance?
Saviynt offers deeper, vendor-neutral governance across heterogeneous systems, converging IGA, application access governance, and PAM. Microsoft Entra ID Governance is capable and well integrated within the Microsoft estate but generally lighter for complex, multi-vendor environments. The better choice depends on how Microsoft-centric the organisation is versus how broad its governance needs are.
How does pricing compare?
Entra ID is transparent: about $6 per user per month for P1, $9 for P2, plus a roughly $7 governance add-on, and is often already included in Microsoft 365 E5. Saviynt is quote-based, priced per identity and module, with substantial configuration costs. For Microsoft-licensed organisations, Entra ID is usually more cost-efficient.
When does Saviynt make more sense than Entra ID?
Saviynt makes more sense when governance must span many vendors uniformly, when converged IGA, application access governance, and privileged access are needed in one platform, and when independence from a single platform vendor matters. Organisations with significant SAP, Oracle, or legacy estates often find Saviynt's cross-system depth exceeds Entra ID's native governance.
What are the limitations of each?
Entra ID's governance depth trails specialist platforms once you move outside the Microsoft ecosystem, and some features require the separate Governance add-on. Saviynt buyers report a steep learning curve, lengthy setup, and uneven support with documentation gaps. Each limitation reflects ecosystem-bundled efficiency versus broad, independent governance complexity.
Can the two be used together?
Yes. Some organisations use Entra ID as the access-management and authentication layer for their Microsoft estate while running Saviynt for enterprise-wide governance across all systems, including non-Microsoft applications. This pairing combines Entra ID's native Microsoft integration with Saviynt's broader, vendor-neutral governance and certification capabilities.
Last updated: April 2026

Get a free, independent vendor shortlist

Tell us what you're evaluating and we'll send a tailored shortlist of vendors that actually fit — no vendor funding, no pay-to-play.

6,000+ vendors · 893 comparisons · 48 country guides · Independent & vendor-neutral

Get a Free Shortlist →