Microsoft Teams vs Google Meet

Feature comparison

Microsoft Teams and Google Meet sit inside different anchor stacks and address different procurement contexts. Teams is the collaboration surface for Microsoft 365 and is consumed at no incremental list cost by every E1, E3, and E5 user. It combines persistent chat, channels, meetings, telephony, webinars, and Copilot-driven summaries in a single client. Meet is a meetings module of Google Workspace, included in every business and enterprise tier, and is rarely procured stand-alone; chat sits in the separate Google Chat product.

On meetings, Teams supports breakout rooms, intelligent recap, transcription, captions, town halls up to 10,000 attendees, and webinars with registration and analytics. Meet has narrowed the meetings gap, with strong Gemini-driven summarisation, real-time translated captions, and support for view-only broadcasts up to 100,000 attendees on Enterprise tiers. On meeting quality itself, the two products are now broadly comparable; choice is driven by the surrounding suite, not the meetings client.

On chat and channels, Teams is a primary collaboration surface and a credible Slack-class persistent messaging product. Google Chat is the equivalent in Workspace but is positioned narrower in scope and consumed at lower intensity by reference customers than Teams chat. For organisations that want one client covering both meetings and persistent collaboration, Teams is the more complete answer.

On AI, Microsoft 365 Copilot is a paid add-on at $30 per user per month and provides Copilot summaries inside Teams, Outlook, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint with access to Microsoft Graph context. Gemini in Meet is included from Workspace Business Plus upwards and provides comparable meeting summarisation, real-time translation, and note-taking. Buyers should confirm Gemini availability against the specific Workspace SKU rather than assuming inclusion.

On telephony, Teams Phone supports Calling Plans, Direct Routing through certified SBCs, and Operator Connect partners across most major markets. Google Voice covers approximately 14 countries with simpler functionality and a narrower carrier ecosystem; for enterprises with global telephony footprints, Teams Phone is materially more capable. Organisations on Workspace requiring broader telephony often pair Meet with RingCentral, Zoom Phone, or Dialpad.

On integrations, Teams hosts a marketplace of more than a thousand partner apps and supports Microsoft Graph and Power Automate for cross-product workflows. Meet integrates tightly with Calendar, Gmail, Drive, Chat, and Apps Script; the marketplace is smaller but the native Workspace integration is operationally meaningful for Workspace-anchored organisations.

Pricing comparison

Microsoft Teams is included with most Microsoft 365 business and enterprise plans at no incremental list cost; Teams Essentials standalone is approximately $4 per user per month. Teams Phone Standard adds approximately $8 per user per month and Teams Phone with Calling Plan around $15 at mid-2026 list pricing. Microsoft 365 Copilot is $30 per user per month. For an organisation on E3 ($36) or E5 ($57), Teams itself is no new line item, but Copilot and Phone can add 25–50% to per-user cost when fully deployed.

Google Meet has no stand-alone SKU; it is included in every Google Workspace tier. Workspace Business Starter is $7.20 per user per month, Business Standard $14.40, Business Plus $21.60, and Enterprise Standard or Plus is custom-priced, typically $23–30 per user per month. Gemini in Meet is included from Business Plus upwards. The principal buying-side caveat is that switching collaboration suites is rarely a like-for-like cost comparison: Workspace bundles meetings and storage in tier price; Microsoft 365 monetises Copilot, Phone, and Premium meetings separately. Buyers should model all-in per-user cost across the full feature surface their organisation actually consumes.

When to choose Microsoft Teams

Choose Microsoft Teams when the organisation is standardised on Microsoft 365 and bundling economics make Teams a no-cost incremental component, when unified chat, channels, meetings, and telephony in a single client is decisive, when Microsoft 365 Copilot is part of the AI strategy, or when consolidating Zoom, Slack, and a legacy PBX into one supplier is the objective. Teams is the more common choice for finance, manufacturing, public sector, and any multinational with significant Microsoft 365 investment. Regulated industries benefit from the breadth of Microsoft Purview compliance tooling.

When to choose Google Meet

Choose Google Meet when the organisation is already on Google Workspace and meetings included in every tier removes the need for a separate communications supplier, when administrative simplicity in a single Workspace tenant is a strategic priority, or when the workload is primarily internal meetings rather than large external webinars or telephony. Meet is well suited to media, advertising, retail, education, and cloud-native organisations standardised on Gmail, Calendar, and Drive. It pairs well with Slack or Discord for organisations running multiple messaging products by team.

Alternatives to both