CNAPP Comparison

Wiz vs Lacework

Independent comparison for cloud-native application protection platforms. Updated May 2026.

Quick verdict: Choose Wiz when the Security Graph attack-path prioritisation, broad multi-cloud parity, and rapid agentless onboarding align with cloud-native engineering teams that want to consolidate CSPM, CWPP, CIEM, and DSPM under one platform. Choose Lacework when the Polygraph behavioural anomaly detection model matters for runtime workload threat detection, when usage-based simplified pricing is preferred, or when the Fortinet acquisition roadmap aligns with broader Fortinet platform consolidation. The differentiator is graph-based exposure prioritisation versus behavioural anomaly-driven runtime detection.

CriteriaWizLacework
Rating4.7 / 5.0 (1,200 reviews)4.3 / 5.0 (640 reviews)
ArchitectureAgentless first, Security GraphAgentless + agent, Polygraph behavioural model
CSPMDeep multi-cloud, identity-awareStrong, mature configuration analysis
CWPPAgentless scanning + Runtime SensorPolygraph runtime anomaly detection
CIEMNative, integrated in GraphNative, separate workflow
DSPMNative, integrated in GraphLimited, evolving
Multi-Cloud DepthAWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, Alibaba parityAWS, Azure, GCP
OwnerIndependent (private)Fortinet (acquired 2024)
Best ForFast time-to-value, developer-friendly CNAPPRuntime anomaly detection, AWS-heavy estates

Feature comparison

Wiz combines agentless cloud-account scanning with a unified Security Graph that connects misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, identities, secrets, exposed services, and sensitive data. The Graph surfaces toxic combinations — an internet-exposed VM with a critical CVE and access to a database holding PII — and ranks findings by exploitable attack path rather than raw severity. Wiz extends the agentless-first model with optional Runtime Sensor for live workload protection, native CIEM, DSPM for data security posture, and AI-SPM for AI/ML workload discovery. The developer-friendly UX and rapid onboarding (often hours) have driven adoption with engineering-led security teams.

Lacework built its platform around the Polygraph model — a behavioural baseline of process, network, and user activity per workload, with anomaly detection flagging deviations from learned normal behaviour. The agent-based runtime delivers strong threat detection for cloud workloads, containers, and Kubernetes without requiring rule-writing for each new threat. Lacework added agentless CSPM, vulnerability scanning, CIEM, and IaC scanning to broaden into full CNAPP. The Fortinet acquisition in 2024 positions Lacework as the cloud security tier within the broader Fortinet Security Fabric, with roadmap integration into FortiGate, FortiSIEM, and FortiSOAR.

The architectural difference shapes evaluation outcomes. Wiz typically wins on exposure context, prioritisation, multi-cloud depth, and developer adoption. Lacework typically wins on runtime anomaly detection in stable workload environments and on simplified usage-based pricing. Compare additional CNAPP options in the cybersecurity category or evaluate against Wiz vs Prisma Cloud.

Pricing comparison

Wiz pricing is per-cloud-workload based, structured around number of cloud accounts and average workload count. Enterprise contracts commonly land in the $200,000-$1,500,000+ ARR range depending on estate size. Wiz pricing is widely viewed as premium relative to competitors but justified by faster deployment and lower operational overhead.

Lacework uses simplified usage-based pricing tied to monitored resources and data volume. Mid-market deployments commonly start in the $40,000-$150,000 ARR range; enterprise deployments scale to $500,000+. Following the Fortinet acquisition, Lacework appears in bundle discussions with FortiGate, FortiSIEM, and other Fortinet platform components, which can materially shift the effective cost for Fortinet-aligned buyers.

When to choose Wiz

Choose Wiz when multi-cloud parity across AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, and Alibaba matters, when Graph-based attack-path prioritisation aligns with the security operating model, or when developer-led security adoption is a primary success criterion. Wiz is also typical for organisations evaluating consolidated CSPM, CWPP, CIEM, DSPM, and AI-SPM on a single agentless-first platform.

When to choose Lacework

Choose Lacework when behavioural anomaly detection on runtime workloads is a primary requirement, when usage-based simplified pricing aligns with procurement, or when Fortinet platform consolidation (FortiGate, FortiSIEM, FortiSOAR) is part of the broader security architecture. Lacework is also typical for AWS-heavy environments where the Polygraph model has the longest deployment history.

Alternatives to both

Broad CNAPP, agent + agentless, Palo Alto ecosystem
4.3
Agentless SideScanning, fast deployment
4.5
Azure-native, multi-cloud, Microsoft estate fit
4.3
Full Wiz Review → Full Lacework Review → All Cybersecurity →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Wiz or Lacework better for runtime threat detection?
Lacework's Polygraph anomaly model has a longer history in runtime workload detection and is well regarded for stable workloads where behavioural baselines mature over time. Wiz Runtime Sensor delivers comparable coverage with tighter integration to the Security Graph. The choice often depends on whether anomaly behaviour or exposure context is the primary detection model.
How does the Fortinet acquisition affect Lacework?
Lacework is now positioned as Fortinet's cloud security tier within the Fortinet Security Fabric. Buyers should evaluate Lacework roadmap integration with FortiGate, FortiSIEM, and FortiSOAR, and consider bundle pricing potential. Standalone product continuity has been maintained post-acquisition.
Which has stronger multi-cloud coverage?
Wiz has broader multi-cloud parity across AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, and Alibaba. Lacework focuses primarily on AWS, Azure, and GCP, with AWS historically deepest. Multi-cloud-first organisations typically rate Wiz higher on coverage parity.
Which is easier to deploy?
Both support agentless onboarding via cloud APIs and typically reach initial value in hours to days. Lacework's agent deployment for runtime adds complexity at scale; Wiz Runtime Sensor is generally simpler operationally. Time-to-value evaluations frequently favour Wiz.
How do they handle CIEM and DSPM?
Wiz integrates CIEM and DSPM natively into the Security Graph, providing identity and data context within the same prioritisation engine. Lacework offers CIEM as a separate workflow and DSPM remains limited relative to dedicated DSPM platforms.
Last updated: May 2026
Last updated: