Microsoft ImplementationDallas, United States

Quisitive Review 2026 — Microsoft Implementation

4.2/ 5.0 from 412 verified buyer references
Founded
2016
Headquarters
Dallas, United States
Employees
~800 (2026)
Regions Served
North America, UK, India
Industries
Mid-market, public sector, healthcare
Typical Engagement
$150K–$8M programmes

Overview

Quisitive is a Microsoft-focused services firm headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with delivery centres across the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and India. The company was founded in 2016 and grew through acquisition, most notably absorbing Catapult Systems in 2020 to consolidate its Microsoft consulting bench. In March 2025, an affiliate of H.I.G. Capital completed a take-private transaction of Quisitive Technology Solutions, removing the firm from the TSX Venture Exchange and resetting it as a private-equity-owned platform with revenue not publicly disclosed.

The Microsoft implementation practice covers the full Microsoft commercial stack: Dynamics 365 (Finance, Supply Chain, Customer Engagement, Business Central), Power Platform, Microsoft 365, Azure infrastructure, and Microsoft Fabric. Quisitive holds Microsoft Solutions Partner designations across all six solution areas and has historically appeared in Microsoft's Inner Circle for Business Applications. Practice teams are organised by Microsoft product family rather than by industry, with industry overlays for healthcare, state and local government, and professional services.

Quisitive fits mid-market buyers (US$100M–$2B revenue) and US public sector agencies seeking a single-throat Microsoft partner with onshore-heavy delivery. The firm is less suited to global Fortune 500 rollouts, which typically require Avanade or Accenture scale, and the H.I.G. Ownership transition introduces near-term execution risk that buyers should weigh during reference checks.

Services Offered

Typical Engagement

Engagement TypeModelTypical Range
Microsoft assessment & roadmapFixed-fee project$80K–$300K (4–10 weeks)
Dynamics 365 or Business Central implementationTime & materials$600K–$5M (6–18 months)
Multi-product Microsoft transformationProgramme-based$3M–$15M (18–36 months)
Microsoft managed servicesMonthly retainer$15K–$180K per month
Staff augmentation (Microsoft consultant)Hourly bill rate$130–$240/hour blended

Pricing verified May 2026 from public procurement data and reference checks; ranges vary by region and engagement structure.

Strengths

  • Deep specialisation in the full Microsoft stack rather than a single product family
  • Mid-market Dynamics 365 bench inherited from the Catapult Systems acquisition
  • Strong US public sector practice with experience in state Medicaid and county government deployments
  • Onshore-heavy delivery from US and Canadian hubs, reducing time-zone friction for North American buyers
  • Microsoft Inner Circle for Business Applications recognition and Solutions Partner designations in all six areas
  • Power Platform and Copilot for Microsoft 365 adoption capability scaled across the bench

Limitations

  • Post-acquisition integration risk following the March 2025 H.I.G. Capital take-private transaction
  • Limited international footprint outside North America, the UK, and a single India delivery centre
  • Thinner senior bench than Avanade or Accenture for global multi-country Microsoft rollouts
  • Revenue and financial stability no longer publicly disclosed following the move to private ownership
  • Methodology assets are less mature than the Microsoft Industry Cloud playbooks used by tier-1 partners

Regions Served

Alternatives

Tier-1 Microsoft partner, joint venture with Accenture, global scale
4.3
Strong Dynamics 365 F&O bench, manufacturing and supply chain focus
4.2
European Dynamics 365 specialist, strong in retail and professional services
4.2
Sister brand inside Quisitive group, US infrastructure and modern workplace
4.1
Business Central mid-market specialist, lower commercial threshold
4.1

Compare Quisitive

Quisitive vs Avanade → Quisitive vs Hitachi Solutions → Quisitive vs HSO →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Quisitive's typical Microsoft project size?
Quisitive engagements typically range from US$150K assessments to US$8M multi-product programmes, with the median Dynamics 365 implementation falling between US$1M and US$3M over nine to fifteen months. The firm rarely competes for sub-$100K projects and is sized for mid-market buyers between US$100M and US$2B in revenue. Public sector contracts can exceed US$10M when state agency deployments are bundled.
How does Quisitive price Microsoft work?
The firm primarily uses time-and-materials with weekly burn-rate reporting, supplemented by fixed-fee assessments and a managed-services retainer model. Blended onshore rates run US$130 to US$240 per hour depending on role mix. Power Platform and adoption-only engagements skew lower; Dynamics 365 Finance & Supply Chain functional consultants command the top end of the range.
How does Quisitive compare to Avanade?
Avanade carries materially more scale (around 60,000 employees versus Quisitive's roughly 800) and is the only Microsoft partner with a structural Accenture joint venture. Quisitive is typically more accessible commercially, more responsive on mid-market projects, and stronger in US state and local government. Avanade wins on global rollouts, regulated industry depth, and Industry Cloud playbooks.
Does Quisitive serve regulated industries?
Quisitive has a healthcare practice covering payers and providers, with experience in HIPAA-aligned Dynamics 365 deployments, and a public sector practice serving US state agencies, county governments, and the Texas-based Department of Information Resources. The firm is not on FedRAMP High projects at scale, and federal-civilian work is limited compared with Accenture Federal Services or Maximus.
What changed after H.I.G. Capital's acquisition in 2025?
The March 2025 take-private transaction removed Quisitive from public markets and brought H.I.G.'s mid-market platform discipline to the business. Buyers should expect tightened internal cost management, potential restructuring of underperforming geographies, and continued bolt-on acquisitions in adjacent Microsoft specialisations. Reference checks in 2026 should probe staff retention and partner-level continuity.
Last updated: May 2026

Get a free, independent vendor shortlist

Tell us what you're evaluating and we'll send a tailored shortlist of vendors that actually fit — no vendor funding, no pay-to-play.

6,000+ vendors · 893 comparisons · 48 country guides · Independent & vendor-neutral

Get a Free Shortlist →