Independent comparison for enterprise buyers. Updated March 2026.
Quick verdict: BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and Ping Identity sit in different parts of the access-security stack, so the decision usually turns on which problem is more urgent rather than direct feature parity. BeyondTrust PRA secures privileged and third-party remote sessions to critical systems with credential injection and full session recording, while Ping Identity is an enterprise identity provider for workforce and customer single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and standards-based federation. The key differentiator is scope: BeyondTrust controls how privileged users reach sensitive infrastructure, whereas Ping controls how every user authenticates across applications.
| Criteria | BeyondTrust PRA | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 4.4 / 5.0 | 4.3 / 5.0 |
| Deployment | Self-hosted appliance or vendor-hosted cloud | PingOne SaaS; PingFederate and PingAccess self-managed |
| Pricing Model | Quote-based, per named user or per endpoint | PingOne Workforce from about $3/user/mo; custom at scale |
| Target Buyer | Security and IT operations managing privileged and vendor access | IT and identity teams standardising workforce and customer SSO |
| Implementation | Days to a few weeks for a focused rollout | Weeks to months; federation work often needs services |
| Key Strength | VPN-less privileged session control with full recording | Standards-based federation and adaptive authentication at scale |
| Key Limitation | Not an identity provider or single sign-on platform | Administration and deployment complexity; services often needed |
| Best For | Securing third-party and administrator access to critical systems | Enterprise workforce and customer identity federation |
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access, the product formerly sold as Bomgar, is built to give administrators and external vendors controlled remote access to sensitive systems without a VPN. It is published by BeyondTrust, headquartered in Johns Creek, Georgia and backed by Francisco Partners, and it focuses on injecting credentials so users never see them, recording every privileged session, and enforcing just-in-time access to servers, network gear, and operational technology.
Ping Identity is an enterprise identity provider covering both workforce and customer identity. Headquartered in Denver and owned by Thoma Bravo since 2022, Ping combines the PingOne cloud platform with PingFederate, PingAccess, and PingDirectory, and it absorbed ForgeRock in 2023 to deepen customer identity and governance. Its job is authentication, single sign-on, and federation across many applications rather than session-level control of privileged infrastructure.
The clearest distinction is that BeyondTrust PRA controls a privileged session after a user is inside the access path, while Ping controls the authentication event that decides who a user is in the first place. PRA brokers connections, vaults and injects credentials, and produces a tamper-evident recording for audit. Ping issues tokens, evaluates risk signals, and federates identity to downstream applications using SAML, OIDC, OAuth, and SCIM.
In practice many enterprises run both: Ping authenticates the workforce, and BeyondTrust governs how a subset of those users, plus outside contractors, reach high-value systems. Treating them as direct competitors usually misframes the evaluation. The real question is whether the immediate gap is privileged-access risk or fragmented application sign-on.
BeyondTrust does not publish list pricing for Privileged Remote Access. Deals are quoted per named user or per endpoint and vary by module, deployment model, and contract term, with multi-year and bundled discounting common. Buyers should expect a custom quote and should clarify whether concurrent or named licensing applies, because that choice materially changes cost for large vendor populations.
Ping publishes entry pricing for PingOne Workforce, with the Essential tier near $3 per user per month and the Plus tier near $6 per user per month on annual commitments that often carry user minimums. Advanced capabilities such as risk-based authentication and API security cost more, and professional services for federation projects commonly run from tens of thousands of dollars into six figures.
BeyondTrust PRA can be deployed as a hardened appliance or consumed as a hosted service, and a focused rollout is often live within days to a few weeks. Its main limitation for buyers comparing it to Ping is simple: it is not an identity provider, so it does not deliver SSO, directory, or customer identity. Administrators also report that the console carries a learning curve.
Ping is more involved to stand up, particularly when PingFederate and PingAccess are self-managed for hybrid estates, and its administration complexity is the limitation most frequently raised. The payoff is depth of federation and flexibility across cloud and legacy applications that lighter tools do not match.
Buyers frequently note that BeyondTrust PRA is valued for credential injection, granular session control, and audit-ready recordings that satisfy third-party access requirements, while the same buyers point to a dense administrative console and quote-only pricing as friction points during procurement. For Ping Identity, reviewers consistently credit the breadth of standards support and the ability to federate complex hybrid and legacy environments, and they describe adaptive authentication as a strength for large deployments. The recurring criticism of Ping is administrative complexity and a steep initial learning curve that often requires dedicated identity engineers or professional services. Across both products, the aggregate sentiment is that each is strong inside its own lane, and dissatisfaction usually appears when an organisation expects one tool to cover the other's territory rather than deploying them for distinct, complementary purposes.
Choose BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access when the pressing risk is uncontrolled administrator or third-party access to critical systems, when auditors require recorded privileged sessions, or when you need VPN-less access for vendors without handing out standing credentials. It suits security and operations teams that already have an identity provider and need session-level control rather than another authentication layer. Plan for it as a privileged-access investment, not a replacement for SSO.
Choose Ping Identity when the priority is standardising authentication across a large or hybrid application estate, federating workforce or customer identity, or supporting legacy systems alongside modern cloud apps. It fits organisations with dedicated identity engineering capacity that value federation depth and adaptive authentication. Budget for implementation effort and, in many cases, professional services, and pair it with a privileged-access tool when admin and vendor sessions also need governing.
Related: BeyondTrust PRA vs Cisco Duo · all comparisons · Identity & Access Management category.
Tell us what you're evaluating and we'll send a tailored shortlist of vendors that actually fit — no vendor funding, no pay-to-play.
6,000+ vendors · 893 comparisons · 48 country guides · Independent & vendor-neutral